Work

Could the new eco schemes replace the long-known agri-environmental measures? Evidence from two labeled discrete choice experiments

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: In the context of the most recent reform of the European Common Agricultural Policy (2023–2027), new voluntary environment-friendly measures have been introduced. These measures, termed eco-schemes, represent one-year arrangements with limited restrictions. They are, therefore, considered to be more flexible than the revised and more demanding agri-environment-climate measures (AECM). The introduction of the new eco-schemes, alongside the AECM, raises questions regarding 1) the acceptance of eco-schemes by farmers, and 2) the impact on adoption of AECM. Would farmers prefer to continue with familiar measures or opt for the new, less restrictive, and shorter eco-schemes? To address these questions, two discrete choice experiments (a stated preference method) were conducted on a sample of 360 farmers with previous AECM experience. These experiments focus exclusively on grassland-related measures, as they are available in both contract forms, eco-schemes and AECM. The results reveal a general aversion to voluntary agri-environmental measures. However, farmers are more inclined to implement the new eco-schemes rather than the more familiar AECM, especially when the compensation of the latter is conditional on the environmental results. The findings also emphasize the impact of restrictions and the flexibility of the contract on farmers’ decision-making processes, particularly when dealing with result-based AECM. • Farmers generally show reluctance to adopt voluntary agri-environmental measures introduced under the 2023 CAP reform. • Eco-schemes are preferred over AECM following the 2023 CAP reform. • Farmers strongly oppose restrictions on fertilizers and herbicides in the new measures. • Flexibility in contract terms, especially in control measures, is crucial for the adoption of result-based AECM. • Tailored policies are needed to address the considerable heterogeneity in farmers' preferences.

Source: Land Use Policy

DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107525

Authors: S. Anougmar, L. Fockaert, K. Michiel, S. Van Passel, S. Van Schoubroeck

Institutions: University of Antwerp, Flemish Government, KU Leuven

Language: English

Topic: Agricultural Economics and Policy

Subfield: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Field: Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Domain: Life Sciences

SDGs: Climate action, Life on land, Zero hunger

Open Access status: hybrid

Estimated APC paid: $3,830