Impact of osteoprotective therapies on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition in melanoma patients – A multicentre study from the prospective skin cancer registry ADOReg
Year: 2025
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: Background Osteoprotective therapy (OT), including denosumab and bisphosphonates, is approved as supportive treatment for patients with solid tumors to prevent skeletal-related events from bone metastases. Preclinical studies and clinical studies/series suggested a synergistic effect of OT and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in metastatic melanoma patients with bone metastases. Therefore, we investigated this issue in a registry study. Methods Melanoma patients with bone metastases undergoing first-line therapy with ICI were retrospectively identified from the prospective skin cancer registry ADOReg. Information on OT was additionally requested from the participating centers. The primary study endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT). Results 180 patients were identified and analysed. Of those, 107 patients (59.4 %) received PD-1 monotherapy and 73 (40.6 %) dual ICI therapy (PD-1 + CTLA-4). 64 patients received additional an OT therapy (36 %) (OT pos ). The median follow-up was 22.6 months (95 % CI=18.2–27.1). There were no significant differences in demographics or clinical parameters between OT pos and OT neg patients. The DCR was comparable between groups (p = 0.758; OT pos = 23.3 % (95 % CI=12.7–35.1), OT neg = 25.5 % (95 % CI=17.0–35.2)). There was no significant difference observed between groups in PFS (p = 0.489; OT pos = 6.7 months (95 % CI=1.3–12.1), OT neg = 6.4 months (95 % CI=1.9–11.0)), in OS (p = 0.065; OT pos = 26.1 months (95 % CI=14.6–37.5), OT neg = 16.9 months (95 % CI=6.2–27.6)) and in TTNT (p = 0.891; OT pos = 18.4 months (95 % CI=10.9–25.9), OT neg = 21.5 months (95 % CI=7.8–35.1)). Summary The majority of melanoma patients with bone metastasis did not receive an OT. No significant effects of OT were observed on efficacy outcomes, including response, PFS, OS, and TTNT.
Source: EJC Skin Cancer
Authors: Corinna Kochanek, Katrin Schaper-Gerhardt, Lisa Zimmer, Selma Ugurel, Friedegund Meier, Peter Mohr, Patrick Terheyden, Sebastian Haferkamp, Martin Kaatz, Michael Sachse, Frank Meiss, Claudia Pföhler, Ulrike Leiter, Jens Ulrich, Dirk Schadendorf, Michael Weichenthal, Imke von Wasielewski, Yenny Angela, Ralf Gutzmer
Institutions: Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden, Ruhr University Bochum, Essen University Hospital, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Elbe Kliniken Stade-Buxtehude, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, University Hospital Regensburg, German Red Cross, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, Klinikum Bremerhaven-Reinkenheide, University of Freiburg, University Medical Center Freiburg, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, University of Tübingen
Language: English
Subfield: Oncology
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $2,340
OpenAlex ID: W4409370410
