Enframing-Unconcealment, Apparatus Governance, and Poetic Creation—From Heidegger to Agamben
Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: 海德格尔与阿甘本都将现代技术问题纳入自己的思想视域中。海德格尔认为集置是技术的本质，将集置定义为促逼着的摆置的集合。在他晚期的本有之思中，自然与人在技术的解蔽中成为持存，存在的无蔽状态被更深的遮蔽。阿甘本在对福柯思想“接着说”的基础上，将技术视为一种装置。他从生命政治的思考中看到，技术以去主体化与分离的策略治理着当代社会的主体。面对技术危机，海德格尔与阿甘本都以诗意创制作为消解手段。海德格尔将艺术引入技术使用，阿甘本则以亵渎来反叛技术束缚。这两种手段在本质上都反映出思想家强调要以思来统摄技术使用，从而避免技术危机的再度发生。Both Heidegger and Agamben incorporate the issue of modern technology into their philosophical frameworks. Heidegger posits that the essence of technology lies in “Enframing” (Gestell), defining it as the gathering of challenging-forth positioning. In his late reflections on “Ereignis” (the event of appropriation), he argues that nature and humanity are reduced to “standing-reserve” (Bestand) within technological revealing, while the unconcealment of Being becomes further concealed. Building upon Foucault’s thought, Agamben conceptualizes technology as an “apparatus”. Through his biopolitical analysis, he reveals how technology governs contemporary subjects through strategies of desubjectification and separation. In response to technological crisis, both thinkers propose poetic creation as a remedy. Heidegger introduces art into technological practice, whereas Agamben advocates “profanation” to resist technological constraints. These approaches fundamentally reflect their shared emphasis on prioritizing contemplative thought to govern technological use, thereby preventing the recurrence of technological crises.
Source: Advances in Philosophy
Author: 郭凯文 毛
Institution: Heilongjiang University
Language: English
Subfield: Sociology and Political Science
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
OpenAlex ID: W4409408041