Comparative Efficacy of Esmolol and Dexmedetomidine in Achieving Controlled Hypotension During Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: a Randomized Double-blind Study
Year: 2025
Type: article
Study designs: Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical Trial
Abstract: Objective: Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) is a prevalent procedure in otorhinolaryngology, often complicated by excessive intraoperative bleeding, which impairs surgical visibility. Controlled hypotensive anesthesia is employed to mitigate blood loss and enhance the surgical field. Esmolol, an ultra-short-acting beta-blocker, and Dexmedetomidine, a selective α₂-adrenergic agonist, are two agents commonly used to achieve controlled hypotension. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of esmolol versus dexmedetomidine in maintaining controlled hypotension during FESS. Methods: A prospective, double-blind, randomized interventional study was conducted involving 60 patients aged 18-65 years with ASA Grade I-II, scheduled for FESS under general anesthesia. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A received an esmolol bolus of 1 mg/kg over 1 minute followed by an infusion of 1 mg/kg/h, while Group B received a dexmedetomidine bolus of 1 µg/kg over 10 min followed by an infusion of 0.5 µg/kg/hr. Hemodynamic parameters, blood loss, duration of surgery, quality of the surgical field, recovery time, analgesic requirements, and complications were recorded and analyzed. Results: Both esmolol and dexmedetomidine groups achieved significant reductions in mean arterial pressure (MAP) without significant differences between the groups. Blood loss and duration of surgery were comparable. Dexmedetomidine was associated with a significantly longer time to first rescue analgesic (58.7±5.09 min vs. 29.83±4.38 min, p<0.001) and prolonged emergence time (7.45±0.98 min vs. 4.45±0.97 min, p<0.001) compared to esmolol. Heart rate was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group throughout the surgery (p<0.001). Complication rates were similar between groups. Conclusion: Both esmolol and dexmedetomidine are effective and safe for achieving controlled hypotension in FESS, providing hemodynamic stability and minimal blood loss. Dexmedetomidine offers superior postoperative analgesia but is associated with delayed emergence, whereas esmolol allows for quicker recovery. Choice of agent can be tailored based on patient-specific requirements and surgical considerations.
Authors: CHANDRA KANT SHARMA, MAINA SINGH, RATAN LAL YADAV
Institution: Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College
Language: English
Subfield: Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W4409497938