Year: 2025
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To externally validate the tetrafecta and pentafecta frameworks for assessing the quality of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and their correlation with oncological outcomes in patients with localised upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 545 patients who underwent RNU for localised UTUC between 2012 and 2023 at eight French university hospitals and one Lebanese university hospital. Achievement of tetrafecta required four criteria to be met: negative surgical margins, complete bladder cuff excision, lymph node dissection (if indicated), and absence of recurrence within 12 months. Pentafecta consisted of the same criteria, plus no major complications or haematological events. Oncological outcomes assessed included intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Kaplan-Meier analyses, Cox regression, and calibration plots were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the frameworks for 3-year outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 29.5% of our cohort achieved tetrafecta and 34.5% achieved pentafecta. Patients meeting either of these quality care metrics demonstrated significantly improved oncological outcomes, with higher 3-year OS rates (tetrafecta: 90.1% vs 74.2%, P < 0.001; pentafecta: 89.4% vs 73.4%, P < 0.001) and RFS rates (tetrafecta: 84.5% vs 57.6%, P < 0.001; pentafecta: 83.5% vs 56%, P < 0.001). Both metrics showed high predictive accuracy for OS (area under the curve [AUC] 0.92 for tetrafecta; 0.93 for pentafecta, P = 0.41) and CSS (AUC 0.944 for tetrafecta; 0.945 for pentafecta, P = 0.6018). Pentafecta achievement was independently associated with better OS and CSS in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-0.55, P < 0.001 and (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.10-0.54, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Tetrafecta and pentafecta are reliable tools for assessing oncological outcomes after RNU in localised UTUC. Pentafecta demonstrated stronger prognostic value for OS, particularly in high-risk populations. These metrics offer a standardised framework to guide clinical decisions, evaluate surgical quality, and counsel patients about prognosis.
Source: British Journal of Urology
DOI: 10.1111/bju.16741
Authors: Igor Duquesne, Pierre‐Etienne Gabriel, Mohamad Abou Chakra, Mohamad Moussa, Raymond Mansour, Mihnea Bogdan Borz, Louise Duffaut, Benoit Mesnard, Said Ourfali, Jeremy Mercier, Michaël Peyromaure, Alexandre de la Taille, Jérôme Rigaud, Alain Ruffion, Frédéric Panthier, Evanguelos Xylinas, Alexandra Masson‐Lecomte, Morgan Rouprêt, Thomas Seisen, Mathieu Roumiguié, the CCAFU
Institutions: Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Lebanese University, University of Illinois Chicago, Hôpital Cochin, Hôpital Tenon, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Clinique Pasteur
Language: English
Subfield: Surgery
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $4,770
OpenAlex ID: W4409651917
