Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: Over the past few years, an overwhelming amount of erroneous information has appeared on social media platforms and other publications. Managing these types of publications poses a difficulty. Frequently, people have feelings of insecurity and are uncertain about how to respond and react to unfounded assertions. This paper examines the approach taken by Hamka (Haji Abdul Malik Karim Amrullah) in addressing these so-called facts. The analysis focused on two primary works, specifically Teguran Suci & Jujur Terhadap Mufti Johor and Antara Fakta dan Khayal Tuanku Rao. The first book responds to assertions that the kaum muda movement led to an increase in issues, such as the growing influence of communism. The second book is a response to a historical publication about Tuanku Rao, a figure of the Padri movement in the 19th century in West Sumatra. False facts prompted Hamka to react and contrast his perspective. In a qualitative approach, the researchers used a structuralist method in order to identify the dichotomies between the authors who made the false claims and Hamka’s rebuttal. In both publications, Hamka had to react to assertions that were not true. His knowledge of historical and statistical facts supported his firm stand. Nonetheless, Hamka strikes a conciliatory tone to prevent a greater conflict. The impact of this research is that in discussions about so-called false facts, it is necessary to rely on sources that are transparent and easy to verify, like historical or statistical facts that are based on reliable sources. A person can implement Hamka's method of discourse by setting aside emotions and focusing on factual information.
Authors: ALEXANDER STARK, KHAIRUL HISYAM BAHARUDDIN, NAZATUL SYIMA MOHD NASIR, ARIEZAL AFZAN HASSAN
Institution: Universiti Malaysia Kelantan
Language: English
Subfield: Sociology and Political Science
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W4409910956