Work

Societal preferences for prioritizing patients suffering from breast cancer, deafness, or knee arthrosis for scarce surgical capacity

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: Objective Constraints on surgical capacity due to budgetary and workforce shortages necessitate prioritization. Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic emphasize the societal debate around these decisions and stress the need to align decisions with societal preferences. This study examines societal preferences for prioritizing patients with three conditions—breast cancer, deafness, or knee arthrosis—for scarce surgical capacity. Methods We conducted a labelled discrete choice experiment among 1,046 members of the Dutch public. Respondents completed 14 choice tasks in which they prioritized patients for surgery, based on their condition, age, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) before and after surgery, and waiting time until surgery. We used conditional logit, multinomial logit, and latent class models to examine (heterogeneity in) respondents’ preferences. Results Respondents were more likely to prioritize patients suffering from breast cancer over those with knee arthrosis or deafness. They also prioritized patients with lower levels of HRQOL before surgery, larger surgery-related increases in HRQOL, and longer waiting times. They were less likely to prioritize patients who were older, except in the case of deafness. Observed preference heterogeneity largely resulted from differences in preference strength, rather than direction. Conclusions Our results provide insight into societal preferences for prioritizing patients with different conditions for surgery. This insight aids in understanding public outcry that may follow deviating decisions. Aligning prioritization decisions with societal preferences may increase the legitimacy of such decisions. Further research may examine the relevance of these preferences for physicians and their willingness to be guided by evidence on societal preferences.

Source: Health Policy and Technology

DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2025.101021

Authors: Vivian Reckers-Droog, Anouk van Alphen, Saskia Knies, Robert Baatenburg de Jong, Thomas Reindersma

Institutions: Erasmus University Rotterdam, Zorginstituut Nederland

Language: English

Topic: Economic and Environmental Valuation

Subfield: Economics and Econometrics

Field: Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Domain: Social Sciences

SDGs: Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities

Open Access status: hybrid

Estimated APC paid: $3,000