Work

Survival Benefits of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Large-Scale Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies that consist of two major subtypes: neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ra) have demonstrated favorable results in preclinical studies, but their impact on NEN outcomes remains unexplored. Methods: Using the TriNetX US Research Network, we identified adult patients with NEN and either diabetes or obesity. After 1:1 propensity score matching based on demographics, comorbidities, procedures, and medication use, we compared survival outcomes between patients who received GLP-1Ra after NEN diagnosis and those who did not. Results: Among 32,464 eligible patients, 3139 received GLP-1Ra and 29,325 did not. After propensity matching, each cohort included 3043 patients with well-balanced baseline characteristics. During follow-up periods extending up to 15 years, all-cause mortality occurred in 356 (11.7%) GLP-1Ra users versus 753 (24.7%) non-users, representing a 13.0% absolute risk reduction (p < 0.001). GLP-1Ra use was associated with significantly improved survival (HR = 0.56, 95%CI = 0.49–0.63, p < 0.001). Both well-differentiated (HR = 0.52) and poorly differentiated tumors (HR = 0.56) showed significant improvement. Among primary sites, lung NENs demonstrated the most pronounced benefit (HR = 0.42). Tirzepatide showed the strongest association with reduced mortality (HR = 0.16), followed by semaglutide (HR = 0.27) and dulaglutide (HR = 0.52). Results: In this large propensity-matched study, GLP-1Ra use was associated with a 44.3% reduction in mortality risk among NEN patients with diabetes or obesity. The magnitude of the observed benefit suggests a potential role for GLP-1Ra as adjunctive therapy in this patient population. Prospective clinical trials are warranted to confirm these findings and explore underlying mechanisms.

Source: Cancers

DOI: 10.3390/cancers17091593