Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: Emerging discussion asks whether it makes sense to speak of animal privacy and how information technologies might increasingly affect it. In an excellent recent article, “Digital Platforms, Privacy, and the Ethics of Wildlife Information Sharing,” Alan Rubel and colleagues defend the idea and ethical importance of animal privacy. Though their argument is compelling, some readers may still worry that the language of ‘animal privacy’ is problematically anthropomorphic. This reply piece examines scepticism about animal privacy, offers suggestions for full or partial acceptance of this term, and mentions some interesting ways that contemporary technology might affect the ‘privacy’ interests of animals.
Source: Philosophy & Technology
Authors: Simon Coghlan, Adam Cardilini
Institutions: The University of Melbourne, Deakin University
Language: English
Topic: Animal Law and Welfare
Subfield: Law
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $3,290
Funder: University of Melbourne
OpenAlex ID: W4410465137