Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: The rapid growth of 4E‐cognition has led to increased skepticism about the role of internal representations in understanding complex cognitive tasks. Critics challenge the idea of representation‐hungry cognition (RHC), rejecting the notion that thinking about absent or abstract objects requires internal representations. Despite criticisms, I argue that RHC remains relevant to understanding what makes cognition truly complex. My goal is to defend RHC while reformulating it to highlight how external vehicles shape cognition through processes of enculturation. I conclude that critics must either accept internal representations in the production of novel content or allow that content be internalized independently of external representational vehicles.
Source: Mind & Language
DOI: 10.1111/mila.12553
Author: James D. Grayot
Institution: Universidade do Porto
Language: English
Subfield: Cognitive Neuroscience
Field: Neuroscience
Domain: Life Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $4,150
OpenAlex ID: W4410734541