Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: The typification of the elm names Ulmus laevis, U. minor, and U. pumila is discussed. Ulmus laevis is lectotypified on a Pallas illustration published in his Flora Rossica. No original material could be located for U. minor and a neotype is designated (a specimen at SLBI). Ulmus pumila is lectotypified on a specimen in LINN. While the lectotype lacks samaras, an epitype is not designated because it is unclear whether there are any species with similar vegetative morphology in the area where the type was collected.
Source: Taxon
DOI: 10.1002/tax.13358
Authors: Duilio Iamonico, Giulia Capotorti
Institution: Sapienza University of Rome
Language: English
Domain: Life Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $2,630
Funder: European Commission
Awards: G1720854406, G5350642880
OpenAlex ID: W4410790898
