Work

Triadic Perspectives on Decision Making in Psychiatry: A Qualitative Study on Service Users, Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals in Latvia

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Decision making is fundamental to personal autonomy and person-centered, rights-based psychiatric care. This study explored the perceptions and experiences of decision making in psychiatric care from the perspectives of service users, caregivers, and healthcare professionals, identifying contexts that facilitate or hinder these practices. METHODS: An exploratory-descriptive qualitative design was applied, using semi-structured interviews with eight service users, six caregivers, and seven healthcare professionals (21 interviews in total). Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed through inductive content analysis. RESULTS: Four main categories were identified: (1) antecedents for decision making, (2) challenges in decision making, (3) consequences of decision making, and (4) recommendations for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insight into how decisions in psychiatric care are made in Latvia, highlighting the legal, personal, and institutional factors influencing these processes. Participants offered valuable perspectives, identifying both facilitators and barriers to autonomous decision making, as well as suggesting necessary improvements. The findings suggest the need for legal reform and systemic improvements in practices that favor agency in decision making. Additionally, they underscore the importance of strengthening individual capacities to support meaningful collaboration among service users, caregivers, and healthcare professionals in making healthcare decisions that enhance the quality of care and well-being of people with mental health difficulties.

Source: Healthcare

DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13121416

Authors: Inese Stars, Karina Konstantinova, Elza Eliza Rozenberga, Solvita Olsena, Ksenija Baidina

Institution: University of Latvia

Language: English

Topic: Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints

Subfield: Clinical Psychology

Field: Psychology

Domain: Social Sciences

SDGs: Good health and well-being, Peace, justice, and strong institutions

Open Access status: gold

Estimated APC paid: $3,258