Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: Humanitarian decision-making occurs in volatile and politically charged environments where information is often incomplete, outdated, or conflicting. Effective humanitarian response often requires interpreting poor-quality data to guide interventions, allocate resources, and assess impact. Despite advances in evidence generation, knowledge gaps persist, and decisions are frequently influenced by political and organizational factors rather than by data. This paper argues that data interpretation is an area of weakness in humanitarian response. Data availability and quality vary across crises, with methodological challenges and political sensitivities further complicating interpretation. The three examples of Darfur (Sudan), Yemen and Ethiopia illustrate how conflicting information and ambiguous interpretation can negatively impact critical decisions with far-reaching consequences on the affected communities. This paper concludes with suggestions for making better interpretation and use of data in humanitarian crises.
Source: Frontiers in Public Health
Authors: Sandro Colombo, Chiara Altare
Institution: Johns Hopkins University
Language: English
Topic: Health and Conflict Studies
Subfield: General Health Professions
Field: Health Professions
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $3,801
OpenAlex ID: W4411326107