Work

Comparing setup time and patient preferences for SCIg therapy: a head-to-head cross-sectional evaluation of two SC pumps

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: BACKGROUND: This study compares the setup time and steps of two different subcutaneous infusion pumps using a 50 mL prefilled syringe (or PFS). METHODS: ("Pump B"; manufactured by EMED Technologies Corporation) pump for subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) therapy. Participants were recruited from the Immune Deficiency Foundation (IDF) patient network. Participants provided informed consent, engaged in a hands-on demonstration, and completed a self-administered survey. RESULTS: 89% reported faster setup times with the Pump A infusion system, resulting in time efficiency improvements. Fast and easy setup, portability, and minimal steps were highly valued and influenced patient satisfaction. Challenges included pump malfunction and complex setup. Patients preferred prefilled syringes due to ease and potential error reduction. Fast setup time was important for arthritis management, reducing stress, work accommodation, and caregiver assistance. CONCLUSION: A significant majority (78%) of patients preferred Pump A over Pump B. It showed advantages in load/unload setup time, resulting in time savings and increased efficiency for SCIg therapy. Incorporating Pump A may enhance treatment adherence and satisfaction, improving outcomes in primary immunodeficiency (PID) management.

Source: Future Science OA

DOI: 10.1080/20565623.2025.2520128

Authors: Brent Rutland, Suzanne Strasters, Jasmin Bosshard

Language: English

Topic: Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety

Subfield: Biomedical Engineering

Field: Engineering

Domain: Physical Sciences

SDG: Good health and well-being

Open Access status: gold

Estimated APC paid: $1,165

Funder: Immune Deficiency Foundation