Work

Correction: Distinguishing genelet circuit input pulses via a pulse detector

Year: 2025
Type: erratum
Abstract: In Appendix Table 3 of this article, the entries '85, 205, 335; 130, 200, 280' in the first and second rows were incorrect and should have been '85, 245, 415; 110, 210, 300.'The incorrect and corrected versions of Table 3 are given below.
Language: English
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $3,190
OpenAlex ID: W4412430858
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: 10