Year: 2025
Type: conference-paper
Abstract: In retrieval augmented generation (RAG) systems, each individual component-the LLM, embedder, and corpus-could introduce biases in the form of skews towards outputting certain perspectives or identities.In this work, we study the conflict between biases of each component and their relationship to the overall bias of the RAG system, which we call bias conflict.Examining both binarized gender and political biases as case studies, we show that bias conflict can be characterized through a linear relationship among components despite its complexity in 6 different LLMs.Through comprehensive fine-tuning experiments creating 120 differently biased embedders, we demonstrate how to control bias while maintaining utility and reveal the importance of reverse-biasing the embedder to mitigate bias in the overall system.Additionally, we find that LLMs and tasks exhibit varying sensitivities to the embedder bias, a crucial factor to consider for debiasing.Our results underscore that a fair RAG system can be better achieved by carefully controlling the bias of the embedder rather than minimizing it to a neutral bias.
Institution: Carnegie Mellon University
Language: English
Subfield: Safety Research
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Funder: National Science Foundation
OpenAlex ID: W4412888059