Work

Do LLMs Understand Dialogues? A Case Study on Dialogue Acts

Year: 2025
Type: conference-paper
Abstract: Recent advancements in NLP, largely driven by Large Language Models (LLMs), have significantly improved performance on an array of tasks.However, Dialogue Act (DA) classification remains challenging, particularly in the fine-grained 50-class, multiparty setting.This paper investigates the root causes of LLMs' poor performance in DA classification through a linguistically motivated analysis.We identify three key pre-tasks essential for accurate DA prediction: Turn Management, Communicative Function Identification, and Dialogue Structure Prediction.Our experiments reveal that LLMs struggle with these fundamental tasks, often failing to outperform simple rulebased baselines.Additionally, we establish a strong empirical correlation between errors in these pre-tasks and DA classification failures.A human study further highlights the significant gap between LLM and human-level dialogue understanding.These findings indicate that LLMs' shortcomings in dialogue comprehension hinder their ability to accurately predict DAs, highlighting the need for improved dialogue-aware training approaches. InstructionYou are an intelligent annotator capable of classifying the intention behind each speaker's utterance.You will be provided with a list of possible Dialogue Acts and their definitions.You will be given an utterance surrounded by '#'.Your task is to predict the correct label for that utterance.You will also be given a snapshot of the conversation to provide context for your prediction.Return the answer in the format: 'label:predicted label'.The Dialogue Acts and their definitions are as follows: Statement: General statements.Accept: A short utterance indicating acceptance of a previous speaker's statement.Disruption: Indecipherable or disrupted speech.Defending/Explanation: The speaker defends their opinion or provides an explanation.
Language: English
Open Access status: hybrid
OpenAlex ID: W4412889882
FWCI: 1.059
Cites:
Cited by: 1
Related to: 10