``I Would Have Written My Code Differently': Beginners Struggle to Understand LLM-Generated Code
Year: 2025
Type: conference-paper
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are being increasingly adopted for programming work. Prior work shows that while LLMs accelerate task completion for professional programmers, beginning programmers struggle to prompt models effectively. However, prompting is just half of the code generation process -- when code is generated, it must be read, evaluated, and integrated (or rejected). How accessible are these tasks for beginning programmers? This paper measures how well beginners comprehend LLM-generated code and explores the challenges students face in judging code correctness. We compare how well students understand natural language descriptions of functions and LLM-generated implementations, studying 32 CS1 students on 160 task instances. Our results show a low per-task success rate of 32.5\%, with indiscriminate struggles across demographic populations. Key challenges include barriers for non-native English speakers, unfamiliarity with Python syntax, and automation bias. Our findings highlight the barrier that code comprehension presents to beginning programmers seeking to write code with LLMs.
Institutions: Northeastern University, Wellesley College, Oberlin College
Language: English
Subfield: Computer Science Applications
Field: Computer Science
Domain: Physical Sciences
SDG: Quality education
Open Access status: green
Funder: National Science Foundation
Awards: Collaborative Research: FW-HTF-RM: AI-Assisted Programming: Equipping Social and Natural Scientists for the Future of Research, Collaborative Research: FW-HTF-RM: AI-Assisted Programming: Equipping Social and Natural Scientists for the Future of Research, Collaborative Research: FW-HTF-RM: AI-Assisted Programming: Equipping Social and Natural Scientists for the Future of Research
OpenAlex ID: W4413267969
