Work

Comparison of Efficacy of 4% Articaine versus Buffered 2% Lidocaine in Mandibular Third Molar Extraction: A Prospective Analytical Study

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: Background: This prospective study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two local anaesthetic solutions: 4% articaine and buffered 2% lidocaine used during mandibular third molar extractions. Materials and Methods: A total of 200 extractions were performed at Sri Aurobindo College of Dentistry, equally divided into two groups. Results and Conclusion: Buffered Lidocaine was associated with reduced pain during injection and faster onset of subjective anaesthesia, whereas Articaine provided better pain control during the procedure. Both anaesthetics showed comparable durations and no postoperative complications, indicating both are safe and effective options when used appropriately.

Source: Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences

DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_882_25

Authors: Nikit Agrawal, Abhinav Jaiswal, Ashish Maheshwari, Tejas Motiwale, Susmitha R. Vyas

Institution: Gajara Raja Medical College

Language: English

Topic: Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques

Subfield: Oral Surgery

Field: Dentistry

Domain: Health Sciences

SDG: Good health and well-being

Open Access status: gold

Estimated APC paid: $250