Work

Assessing renewable energy installations in pig farms from a financial and environmental perspective: a case study in the EU

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: Livestock farms rely heavily on fossil fuels to achieve a suitable indoor climate. Only 4 % of this on-farm energy demand is currently provided by renewable energy sources (RES). In order to reach the European Union’s ambitious Fit-for-55 climate goals, a higher renewable energy integration is crucial. This work aims to assess the financial and environmental effects of RES integration on an individual livestock farm. Therefore, a methodology is presented that allows the selection of different combinations of RES technologies and sizes, based on technical, financial and environmental considerations, accompanied by a sensitivity analysis on the implemented assumptions. As a case study, 92,650 different scenarios containing various renewable energy sources and different sizes are simulated on a pig barn in Belgium. The RES technologies selected are (thermal) photovoltaic panels, solar collectors, small wind turbines, heat pumps, electrochemical batteries and a thermal storage tank. Within the explored solution space, 84 % of the scenarios have a lower life cycle cost (LCC) and all of them result in lower – down to 85 % – fuel-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. If the investment cost is, for example, limited to five times the cost of the reference scenario – a natural gas boiler for € 5,500 – an installation of 100 m 2 photovoltaic (PV) panels in combination with a 60 kW th boiler is most effective at reducing the LCC (10 % reduction in LCC, 6 % fuel-related GHG emission reduction) while a combination of two heat pumps of (12 + 48 kW th ) and 25 m 2 PV reduce the most fuel-related GHG emissions (46 % GHG reduction, but increasing the LCC by 5 %). For a limitation of 10 times the investment cost, a minimum LCC is obtained with 500 m 2 PV and 60 kW th boiler (24 % reduction in LCC, 15 % fuel-related GHG emission reduction), while fuel-related GHG emissions are most effectively reduced by an installation of 200 m 2 PV, two heat pumps (12 + 48 kW th ), a 5,000 Liter thermal storage tank, and 5 kWh battery (56 % fuel-related GHG reduction, 11 % reduction in LCC). Sensitivity analyses indicate that these optima are highly dependent on the emission factor of the electricity grid, as well as the (projected) electricity and gas prices.

Source: Renewable Energy

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.124291

Authors: Manon Everaert, Jarissa Maselyne, Robin Tassenoy, Jera Van Nieuwenhuyse, Steven Lecompte

Institutions: Ghent University, Instituut voor Landbouw en Visserijonderzoek

Language: English

Topic: Energy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis

Subfield: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Field: Energy

Domain: Physical Sciences

SDGs: Affordable and clean energy, Climate action, Responsible consumption and production, Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Zero hunger

Open Access status: hybrid

Estimated APC paid: $4,460