Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: In 2019, a British inventor applied for a patent for an inclined toilet that sought to be uncomfortable for its users. Despite the controversy it created, the case has not produced any academic reflection so far. The aim of this article is twofold: on the one hand, it analyses the morality of these types of inventions; on the other hand, it discusses the commitment that patent systems have with certain moral values, such as human dignity or public order. Regarding the first aim, we conclude that, in inventions such as these toilets, the risks clearly outweigh the benefits. Consequently, we argue that patent systems do not have the appropriate tools to face immoral inventions. This is because the patent system is not concerned with the use nor the impact that inventions have, something that, we believe, may influence the very justification of these intellectual property regimes.
Source: Tópicos Revista de Filosofía
Authors: Benedicto Acosta, Elisa Calleja-Sordo
Language: English
Topic: Intellectual Property Law
Subfield: Law
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W4413514571