Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: I here reply to Martin Stokhof and Jaap van der Does’ criticism of my translation of ‘Satz’ as ‘proposition’ in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, arguing that they fail to appreciate the difference between translation and interpretation.
Source: Nordic Wittgenstein Review
Author: Michael Beaney
Institutions: University of Aberdeen, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Language: English
Subfield: Philosophy
Field: Arts and Humanities
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W4413686137
