Work

From Emails to EMR: Implementing I-PASS Among Inpatient Palliative Care Clinicians at a Comprehensive Cancer Center—A Quality Improvement Initiative

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: Background: Inpatient palliative care consultation services operate with an interdisciplinary team, where effective handoffs are crucial for coordinated patient care. We aimed to replace encrypted email handoffs with a more concise and uniform handoff using I-PASS (illness severity, patient summary, action list, situational awareness, contingency planning, and synthesis by receiver) integrated within the electronic medical record (EMR). Aim and Measures: Within six months of launch, our goal was to achieve 90% I-PASS utilization for hospitalized acutely ill patients with cancer receiving palliative care consultation. Intervention: In January 2021, our quality improvement team, consisting of physicians, advanced practice providers, and trainees, began implementing I-PASS using the plan–do–study–act cycle. After providing training sessions for all palliative care clinicians, I-PASS went live on October 1, 2021. I-PASS utilization was tracked via random and monthly audits of EMRs. Through anonymous surveys, both pre- and post-implementation, we gathered clinician feedback and concerns about the handoff system. Survey responses were compared using the Mann–Whitney test. Outcomes: Within six months of implementation, the I-PASS utilization rate reached > 99%. The survey participation rates were 70% (45/64) and 82% (49/60) for the pre-and post-implementation periods, respectively. Respondents provided answers on one to five scale (mean, standard deviation, SD): lower accuracy with email (3.53, SD = 0.98) vs. I-PASS (4.20, SD = 0.83), p < 0.001; handoff lengthier with email (4.17, SD = 1.05) vs. I-PASS (2.1, SD = 1.15), p < 0.001; the time required was longer with email (3.0, SD = 1.22) vs. I-PASS (1.71, SD = 0.73), p < 0.001. Overall, respondents found I-PASS to be significantly better (4.69, SD = 0.58). Conclusion: I-PASS was fully adopted by the team, with nearly 100% utilization and strong clinician endorsement as an effective communication tool. Future efforts should focus on optimizing usability, particularly by educating clinicians on smartphone EMR access and enabling the timely and streamlined editing of I-PASS.

Source: Cancers

DOI: 10.3390/cancers17172875