Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: Extensions of equivalent representations of gravity are discussed in the metric-affine framework. First, we focus on: (i) General Relativity, based upon the metric tensor whose dynamics is given by the Ricci curvature scalar R ; (ii) the Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity, based on tetrads and spin connection whose dynamics is given by the torsion scalar T ; (iii) the Symmetric Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity, formulated with respect to both the metric tensor and the affine connection and characterized by the non-metric scalar Q with the role of gravitational field. They represent the so-called Geometric Trinity of Gravity, because, even if based on different frameworks and different dynamical variables, such as curvature, torsion, and non-metricity, they express the same gravitational dynamics. Starting from this framework, we construct their extensions with the aim to study possible equivalence. We discuss the straightforward extension of General Relativity, the f ( R ) gravity, where f ( R ) is an arbitrary function of the Ricci scalar. With this paradigm in mind, we take into account f ( T ) and f ( Q ) extensions showing that they are not equivalent to f ( R ). Dynamical equivalence is achieved if boundary terms are considered, that is $$f(T-\tilde{B})$$ f ( T - B ~ ) and $$f(Q-B)$$ f ( Q - B ) theories. The latter are the extensions of Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity and Symmetric Teleparallel of General Relativity, respectively. We obtain that f ( R ), $$f(T-\tilde{B})$$ f ( T - B ~ ) , and $$f(Q-B)$$ f ( Q - B ) form the Extended Geometric Trinity of Gravity. The aim is to show that also if dynamics are equivalent, foundations of theories of gravity can be very different.
Source: The European Physical Journal C
Authors: Salvatore Capozziello, Sara Cesare, Carmen Ferrara
Language: English
Subfield: Astronomy and Astrophysics
Field: Physics and Astronomy
Domain: Physical Sciences
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W4413904686