Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: In this article, I argue that the state creates legal advice deserts in immigration and asylum by designing law and policy which drive up legal need, driving down provision through unfavourable conditions for providers, and by placing people in need into areas from which they have no realistic prospect of accessing legal advice and representation. I draw on frameworks of spatial justice and of demand to analyse the impact of the legislative and policy developments in the Special Issue’s focal period of 2022–24 on legal aid in each of the UK’s three legal aid systems: England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. The legislative changes included introducing new stages into asylum law, which created new legal needs. Policy changes drove a wholesale geographical shift in demand as all local authorities in the UK (except Scilly) now host people in the asylum process. The changes depended upon the involvement of legal aid lawyers in order to be workable, but the marketised model of legal aid provision in England and Wales, and the low-paid laissez faire model in Northern Ireland, are fundamentally incompatible with that demand. I conclude by arguing that legal aid cannot be an afterthought. Asylum policy should be shaped to reduce failure demand, while legal aid policy should be funded and designed so as to pay for the necessary provision, with interventions to remove the spatial inequalities in access to (legal) justice.
Source: Laws
DOI: 10.3390/laws14050064
Author: Jo Wilding
Institution: University of Sussex
Language: English
Subfield: Law
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $1,689
OpenAlex ID: W4414023666