Work

Universal models for comprehensive prediction of soil quality responses to complex amendments in acidic soil

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: • A comprehensive dataset was compiled from varied amendments on acidic soils. • Random forest and multiple linear regression simulated the amendment effect. • Both models can reproduce key indicator changes after amendment application. • Model predictions were validated in the field (multiple sites) with high accuracy. • The study proposes a tool for new amendments innovation and field application. Soil acidification poses a serious threat to sustainable use of arable land. Applying soil amendments are effective measures to counteract the widely occurred soil acidification. However, a method to accurately predict the amendment effects on soil acidification is lacking. In this study, a total of 41 soil culture treatments, covering organic, inorganic, and their combinations, were conducted to compile a comprehensive dataset, which was further used to establish a model to predict the performance of amendments. The random forest (RF) and multiple linear regression (MLR) were adopted to model soil quality changes due to varying amendments application. 30 % percent of the culture treatment dataset and field observations were used to validate the model performance. The results demonstrate that MLR models are less robust in predicting the change in soil indicators, with the R 2 varying 0.6∼0.82. For some soil indicators, such as exchangeable acid (Ex-Acid), exchangeable calcium and cation exchange capacity (CEC), due to weak adherence to key assumptions such as linearity, homoscedasticity, and normality, which likely impaired their predictive reliability. Such limitations could reduce the model’s fitting accuracy and predictive stability for certain soil properties. The RF model is excellent at reconstructing changes in all soil chemical properties, with R 2 greater than 0.80. This includes soil pH, Ex-Acid, exchangeable calcium, and exchangeable magnesium, except for changes in CEC, which rarely changed after amendments application. Validation of model predictions through multi-site field observations further confirmed the robust predictions for multiple types of amendments. In particular, the prediction results of RF for Ex-acid are better than those of MLR. The overall outcomes suggest that RF model demonstrated greater reliability and adaptability, highlighting its practical value for guiding amendment selection in acid soil management.

Source: Geoderma

DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117495