Comparison of dusty robotics and traditional layout methods
Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: The use of robots in construction has been rising in recent years. However, limited knowledge is available to understand how robots perform compared to existing processes. Therefore, this research compares the performance of manual layout to Dusty Robotics’ layout robot, an autonomous robot that marks the location of structures to be built and fixtures to be installed on a construction site. Using a Robot Evaluation Framework, we evaluate safety, quality, cost, and schedule performance metrics on drywall, mechanical, plumbing, and electrical layout in an 8-floor medical office building in Los Angeles as a case study. Dusty significantly outperformed manual layout methods across these parameters, resulting in a 68% reduction in total labor hours, an 18% decrease in total days spent performing layout, and a 99% reduction of physically straining work. Accuracy was enhanced by 50%, and design conflicts were identified earlier during the robotic layout process compared to the traditional process. Rework was reduced from 6.42% to 0.25%, a 96% reduction. The research findings suggest avenues to maximize the benefits of robotic layout, such as introducing the robot earlier in the project lifecycle during pre-construction and deploying multiple robots simultaneously. Layout robots present a promising technology for construction contractors to deploy on jobsites to improve project outcomes.
Source: Construction Robotics
Authors: Alexis Kam, Yuuki Tanaka, Cynthia Brosque, Henning Roedel, Tessa Lau, Martin Fischer
Institution: Stanford University
Language: English
Subfield: Building and Construction
Field: Engineering
Domain: Physical Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $3,190
OpenAlex ID: W4414203701