Do Allergic Comorbidities Alter the Efficacy and Safety of Abrocitinib or Dupilumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis?
Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Allergic comorbidities are common in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Individual trials with abrocitinib or dupilumab demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe AD and allergic comorbidities. This post hoc analysis of the phase 3 JADE COMPARE and DARE trials compared efficacy, safety, and quality of life following abrocitinib and dupilumab treatment in adults with moderate-to-severe AD, with or without comorbid asthma, allergic rhinitis, or food allergy. METHODS: Data were pooled from patients who received abrocitinib (200 mg/day) or dupilumab (300 mg/every 2 weeks) for 16 weeks with concomitant topical therapy. Assessments by self-reported asthma, allergic rhinitis, or food allergy included the proportion of patients achieving Investigator's Global Assessment of clear or almost clear (IGA 0/1), ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75), ≥ 4-point improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4), least squares mean change from baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), and safety. RESULTS: Of 1195 patients (abrocitinib, n = 588; dupilumab, n = 607), 377 (32%), 225 (19%), and 211 (18%) patients self-reported comorbid asthma, food allergy, or allergic rhinitis, respectively. Week 16 IGA 0/1 responses were comparable between patients with/without comorbidity with abrocitinib (52%/54% [with/without asthma], 50%/54% [with/without allergic rhinitis], and 53%/53% [with/without food allergy]) or dupilumab (42%/42%, 37%/43%, and 47%/41%). EASI-75 and PP-NRS4 responses and DLQI and SCORAD improvements were also comparable between patients with/without comorbidity in each treatment arm. Treatment-emergent adverse events were more common in patients with comorbidities in the abrocitinib (76%/67% [with/without asthma], 80%/67% [with/without allergic rhinitis], and 78%/67% [with/without food allergy]) and dupilumab (71%/53%, 71%/57%, and 62%/59%) arms. CONCLUSION: Abrocitinib and dupilumab improved AD signs and symptoms with a manageable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe AD, regardless of asthma, allergic rhinitis, or food allergy. Graphical Abstract available for this article. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03720470 (JADE COMPARE) and NCT04345367 (DARE).
Source: Dermatology and Therapy
Institutions: Oregon Health & Science University, George Washington University, UC San Diego Health System, University of California San Diego, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, University Hospital Zurich, CK-CARE, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Université de Lille, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Fujian Medical University, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Pfizer (United States), Pfizer (United Kingdom), Pfizer (Spain), Pfizer (Austria)
Language: English
Subfield: Dermatology
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $7,400
Funders: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Gilead Sciences, Biogen, Celgene, CSL Behring, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Les Laboratories Pierre Fabre, Mylan, Incyte, Yuhan, Horizon Therapeutics, EQRx, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Galderma, Medac, LG Chem, LEO Pharma, Genentech, Samsung, Sanofi Genzyme, Daiichi Sankyo Europe
OpenAlex ID: W4414434504
