Work

Public prosecutors' perspectives on forensic medical information in non-fatal injury cases in the Netherlands: practices, barriers and recommendations

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: Public prosecutors in the Netherlands play a crucial role in ensuring that criminal cases are supported by evidence. This study surveyed public prosecutors to examine current practices, barriers, and recommendations related to the use and availability of forensic medical reports in cases involving non-fatal injuries, including the use of injury dating. Twelve prosecutors with specific injury-related expertise from 8 out of the 10 police regions completed the online survey. Medical information was viewed as contributing to criminal law proceedings. Forensic medical information was considered particularly important in serious cases such as severe abuse, attempted manslaughter, sexual assault, and domestic violence. Information from treating physicians specifically in cases involving permanent injuries or repeated incidents, especially in the context of domestic violence. However, use of the latter was often limited by concerns about quality, completeness, and accessibility. Key barriers included time constraints, a shortage of forensic doctors, unclear procedures within the police, privacy concerns among treating physicians, and limited awareness among prosecutors. To address these issues, prosecutors emphasized the need for improved training, the appointment of specialized personnel, stronger interdisciplinary collaboration, and the development of clear procedural guidelines. In conclusion, this study offers concrete recommendations to enhance the integration of forensic medical expertise into criminal proceedings, contributing to a more effective, efficient, and equitable judicial process. • Forensic medical reports are regularly missing in non-fatal injury cases. • Treating physicians’ information helps in complex, long-term injury cases. • Information from treating physicians may be difficult to obtain. • Shortage of qualified forensic doctors limits expert input. • Standardized protocols, collaboration, and training can improve injury evidence.

Source: Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine

DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2025.102976