Work

Balancing fun and professionalism in game development: the dark and light side of play in virtual meetings

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated remote work adoption in the game development industry, an already precarious field characterized by “crunch” culture and ludopolitics. Against this backdrop, this study examines the dual nature of “play” in virtual meetings (VMs) among game industry professionals (N = 38). Methods Through semi-structured interviews, we identify three primary manifestations of play: self-presentation through avatars and backgrounds, technological experimentation, and direct gameplay. Results Our findings reveal that playful elements simultaneously offer benefits, or “light” sides—enhanced creativity, reduced video conferencing fatigue, improved team cohesion and drawbacks, or “dark” sides—distractions, reduced professionalism in client-facing settings. Discussion Context emerges as a critical determinant of play’s appropriateness—indie studios embrace playfulness more readily than corporate environments, while brainstorming sessions accommodate play better than task-oriented meetings. Avatar use particularly highlights this complexity, potentially reducing fatigue while raising concerns about professional trust. These findings contribute to understanding how game developers navigate integrating play into professional spaces, suggesting that successful implementation requires careful consideration of meeting context, company culture, and workplace objectives.

Source: Frontiers in Communication

DOI: 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1609776

Authors: Dalton Bouzek, Maxwell Foxman, Chaeyun Lim, Alex P. Leith

Institutions: Kansas State University Salina Aerospace and Technology Campus, University of Oregon, Northwestern University, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville

Language: English

Topic: Digital Games and Media

Subfield: Sociology and Political Science

Field: Social Sciences

Domain: Social Sciences

Open Access status: gold

Estimated APC paid: $1,418

Funder: National Science Foundation