Year: 2021
Type: article
Abstract: Pharmaceutical manufacturers and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention rely on mobile phone apps and adverse event reporting websites as the primary means of active surveillance from patients for COVID-19 vaccines.1 However, digital tools for side-effect surveillance emphasise data collection over providing user feedback, and public misperceptions might influence what is reported and the causal attributions. Preliminary evidence shows that traditional fact-checking approaches to side-effect misinformation can backfire by establishing unsound causal connections; when submitted to health authorities, plausible reports of biological harm might be dismissed if they are tinged with misperceptions.
Source: The Lancet Digital Health
Language: English
Subfield: Toxicology
Domain: Life Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $5,000
OpenAlex ID: W3131448762
