Evaluating the real-world scale-up of the CRADLE Vital Signs Alert intervention into routine maternity care in Sierra Leone (CRADLE-5): a stepped-wedge, type 2 hybrid implementation–effectiveness, cluster-randomised controlled trial

Year: 2025

Type: article

Study designs: Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical Trial

Abstract: Background Sierra Leone has one of the highest maternal mortality ratios globally. Most preventable maternal deaths result from haemorrhage, hypertension, or sepsis, yet many facilities do not have the basic tools for vital sign monitoring. This study evaluated whether national scale-up of the CRADLE intervention (a vital signs device with a traffic-light early warning system and training) could reduce adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes and be sustainably integrated into routine care. Methods We conducted a pragmatic, hybrid type 2 implementation–effectiveness, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial across eight districts in Sierra Leone. Each district (cluster) transitioned from routine care to the CRADLE intervention in a randomised sequence every 6 weeks. The intervention included device distribution, cascade training by local CRADLE champions, and integration into clinical pathways. The primary clinical outcome was a composite of eclampsia, emergency hysterectomy, maternal death, or stillbirth (without double counting). Implementation and scale-up evaluation included outcomes related to fidelity, adoption, and system integration. All analyses followed an intention-to-treat principle. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, 94429427, and is completed. Findings Between May 23, 2022, and June 30, 2023, 2171 CRADLE devices were distributed to 643 government health facilities, and 2135 frontline workers were trained. Among 93 811 deliveries (40 339 pre-intervention and 53 472 post-intervention, 1568 (1·7%) women (699 [1·7%] in the pre-intervention group and 869 [1·6%] in the post-intervention group) experienced at least one primary clinical outcome event (134 vs 205 eclamptic fits, 32 vs 39 emergency hysterectomies, 60 vs 66 maternal deaths, and 551 vs 650 stillbirths), with no significant reduction in the composite primary outcome for deliveries taking place pre-intervention and post-intervention (incidence risk ratio [IRR] 1·01, 95% CI 0·87–1·16). With respect to implementation outcomes, vital signs measurement frequency increased with implementation of the intervention (IRR 1·38, 95% CI 1·07–1·77), with improved accuracy (terminal digit preference, ie, recording values ending in 0 or 5, declined from 32·8% to 8·7%; IRR 0·44, 95% CI 0·25–0·79). Sustainable scale-up was strengthened by national leadership, integration into training curricula, and community engagement. Persistent system-level barriers—including insufficient availability of essential drugs, workforce shortages, inadequate infrastructure such as electricity supply, and low clinical impact—restricted effectiveness. Interpretation National scale-up of the CRADLE intervention improved detection of maternal complications and referral practices but did not reduce overall adverse outcomes. The trial showed that large-scale adoption of CRADLE is feasible and identified barriers to facilitate an impact on maternal and perinatal mortality. Strengthening of the broader health system in Sierra Leone is required. Funding UK National Institute for Health and Care Research and UNICEF.

Source: The Lancet Obstetrics Gynaecology & Women s Health

DOI: 10.1016/j.lanogw.2025.09.003

Institutions: King's College London, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, University of Sierra Leone, University College London

Language: English

Topic: Health Policy Implementation Science

Subfield: General Health Professions

Field: Health Professions

Domain: Health Sciences

SDG: Good health and well-being

Open Access status: hybrid

Estimated APC paid: $7,280

Funders: UNICEF, National Institute for Health and Care Research

OpenAlex ID: W4414909224