Work

The difference in social welfare between urban and rural areas and the reform of the household registration system: evidence based on the satisfaction of Chinese residents

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: Based on data from the Chinese General Social Survey, this study constructs a multidimensional evaluation system covering public education, health care, housing security and other social welfare areas to empirically examine differences in residents’ social welfare satisfaction under the urban–rural household registration system. The research finds that urban residents exhibit higher social welfare satisfaction than rural counterparts. While urban–rural public education satisfaction appears convergent superficially, significant gaps exist in quality dimensions, with rural areas lagging behind cities. The contradiction between adequacy and accessibility of medical resources between urban and rural areas is acute. Notably, in housing security, rural residents show higher satisfaction with low-rent housing and public rental housing compared to urban residents. Rural satisfaction is also lower in infrastructure, public culture, employment, social security and elderly care services. The study proposes countermeasures including establishing a fiscal equalization mechanism dynamically matching welfare gaps, implementing stratified household registration reforms adapted to city scales, and deepening welfare equalization in education, healthcare, housing and other domains. However, the investigation results of this paper are based on the measurement of residents’ subjective satisfaction and cross-sectional design, and the causal relationship between the two cannot be established through causal identification design. Further empirical tests are needed in the future.

Source: Cogent Social Sciences

DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2025.2567517

Authors: Longshun Xu, Xiansheng Chen, Yuqing Han, Feng Li

Institutions: Jiangsu Normal University, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, East China University of Political Science and Law

Language: English

Topic: China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance

Subfield: Political Science and International Relations

Field: Social Sciences

Domain: Social Sciences

SDGs: Reduced inequalities, Sustainable cities and communities, No poverty

Open Access status: gold

Estimated APC paid: $1,165