Work

Clinician and patient perspectives on implementation of a remote interpretation model of reflectance confocal microscopy for skin cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study using an acceptability framework

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: Remote interpretation of cutaneous/reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is an innovative and acceptable means to increase access to the noninvasive diagnostic technology; however, implementation and acceptability is reliant on several key factors. These are the ability of remote RCM to generate meaningful data for remote interpretation, technological connectivity, cultural and infrastructure supports, and individual capabilities and motivation to use the innovation.

Source: British Journal of Dermatology

DOI: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf348

Authors: Genevieve Ho, Andrea L Smith, Helena Collgros, Christoph Sinz, Bruna Melhoranse-Gouveia, Bruna Gallo, Christopher Chew, Cheng Huang, Ucalene Harris, Manu Jain, Ken Ip, James Koutsis, Rodrigo Schwartz-Aldea, Hsien Herbert Chan, Hannah Grace Gribbin, Rhonda A Harvey, Victoria Mar, H Peter Soyer, Linda K Martin, Anne E Cust, Pascale Guitera

Institutions: The University of Sydney, UNSW Sydney, Melanoma Institute Australia, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

Language: English

Topic: Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management

Subfield: Oncology

Field: Medicine

Domain: Health Sciences

SDG: Good health and well-being

Open Access status: hybrid

Estimated APC paid: $4,920

Funders: University of Warwick, University of New South Wales, Melanoma Institute Australia, National Health and Medical Research Council

Awards: Tailored approaches to improve prevention and early detection of melanoma and other skin cancers , G2277177611, Centre of Research Excellence in Melanoma: Person, tumour and system-focussed knowledge to drive better outcomes in melanoma

OpenAlex ID: W4415055489

FWCI:

Cites: 8

Cited by:

Related to: