Get started
Work

Servant Leadership Reduces Attrition: Evidence Against Autocratic Leadership Style in Rural Ghanaian Health Facilities

Year: 2025
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: Background Healthcare worker attrition remains a major challenge in rural Ghana, undermining access to quality care and continuity of services. While financial and infrastructural constraints have received extensive attention, the role of leadership in shaping workforce motivation and retention is less understood. This study investigates how different leadership styles influence healthcare worker satisfaction, engagement, and intent to remain in rural health facilities. Methods A mixed-methods design was adopted, combining quantitative and qualitative data. Structured Likert-scale surveys were administered to 220 healthcare professionals, complemented by open-ended responses from 74 participants. Quantitative analysis employed correlation and regression techniques to examine the impact of transformational, servant, democratic, participative, and autocratic leadership on job satisfaction and retention outcomes. Qualitative responses were analyzed thematically to contextualize the statistical patterns observed. Results The findings revealed a clear contrast between servant and autocratic leadership styles. Servant leadership demonstrated strong negative correlations with attrition intent (e.g., r = –0.29 for trust) and positive correlations with intent to stay (r = +0.44 for well-being), indicating that empathy, trust, and staff-centered support enhance motivation and loyalty. Conversely, autocratic leadership showed positive correlations with attrition (r = +0.30 for rule enforcement) and negative correlations with intent to stay (r ≈ –0.11), signifying that rigid, fear-driven supervision erodes morale and engagement. Qualitative narratives reinforced these patterns, describing servant and participative leaders as supportive and communicative, and autocratic leaders as intimidating and disengaging. Conclusion Servant, participative, and democratic leadership styles promote psychological safety, teamwork, and retention, whereas autocratic leadership accelerates turnover. Embedding empathy, inclusion, and feedback into leadership development is critical for strengthening Ghana’s rural health workforce. Cultivating servant and participative leadership can foster organizational learning, resilience, and sustainability—key enablers of Universal Health Coverage in resource-limited settings.
DOI: 10.63363/aijfr.2025.v06i05.1562
Language: English
Open Access status: hybrid
OpenAlex ID: W4415091630
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: