NDAs: Legally unenforceable or just unethical? A contract law perspective
Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: Evidence suggests that non-disclosure agreements (‘NDAs’) are widely used. Instead of their intended use of protecting trade secrets and commercially sensitive information, they were exposed during #MeToo as tools to hide sexual harassment and assault. Evidence suggests they remain pervasive and pernicious, and require more scrutiny. As contracts, how legally enforceable are they? The article will attempt to answer this question by applying some well-known contract principles to the real-life NDA between Zelda Perkins and Harvey Weinstein/Miramax, widely reported in the media. This analysis will cast some doubts around their enforceability and at the same time suggest a broader social role for contract law.
Source: Alternative Law Journal
Author: Renata Grossi
Institution: University of Technology Sydney
Language: English
Subfield: Law
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $3,650
OpenAlex ID: W4415166945
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to:
