Investigating Political and Demographic Associations in Large Language Models Through Moral Foundations Theory
Year: 2025
Type: conference-paper
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have become increasingly incorporated into everyday life for many internet users, taking on significant roles as advice givers in the domains of medicine, personal relationships, and even legal matters. The importance of these roles raise questions about how and what responses LLMs make in difficult political and moral domains, especially questions about possible biases. To quantify the nature of potential biases in LLMs, various works have applied Moral Foundations Theory (MFT), a framework that categorizes human moral reasoning into five dimensions: Harm, Fairness, Ingroup Loyalty, Authority, and Purity. Previous research has used the MFT to measure differences in human participants along political, national, and cultural lines. While there has been some analysis of the responses of LLM with respect to political stance in role-playing scenarios, no work so far has directly assessed the moral leanings in the LLM responses, nor have they connected LLM outputs with robust human data. In this paper we analyze the distinctions between LLM MFT responses and existing human research directly, investigating whether commonly available LLM responses demonstrate ideological leanings — either through their inherent responses, straightforward representations of political ideologies, or when responding from the perspectives of constructed human personas. We assess whether LLMs inherently generate responses that align more closely with one political ideology over another, and additionally examine how accurately LLMs can represent ideological perspectives through both explicit prompting and demographic-based role-playing. By systematically analyzing LLM behavior across these conditions and experiments, our study provides insight into the extent of political and demographic dependency in AI-generated responses.
Institution: Tulane University
Language: English
Subfield: Safety Research
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: bronze
Awards: Collaborative Research: RI: Small: Modeling and Learning Ethical Principles for Embedding into Group Decision Support Systems, NSF-BSF: RI: Small: Mechanisms and Algorithms for Improving Peer Selection, CAREER: Making Better Decisions: A Proposal for Human-Centered Computational Social Choice using Artificial Intelligence and Data, SCC-IRG Track 2: Supporting Transparency and Equity in the Criminal Legal System through a Community-Driven Digital Platform, III: Medium: Collaborative Research: Fair Recommendation Through Social Choice
OpenAlex ID: W4415230940
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to:
