Work

Environmental judicial reform and corporate greenwashing: evidence from China’s environmental public interest litigation pilot

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: Environmental public interest litigation (EPIL) is an innovative judicial system for strengthening judicial protections and safeguarding social and public interests. However, the effect of EPIL on corporate greenwashing remains underexplored. To fill this gap, this study investigates the impact of environmental judicial reform on corporate greenwashing behavior and explores the underlying mechanism. Using data of China’s A-share listed companies between 2012 and 2017, we find that EPIL can effectively restrain corporate greenwashing behavior. This effect is more pronounced among state-owned enterprises, firms with limited media or analyst coverage, and those in highly polluted, competitive industries, firms in cities with stringent legal frameworks, weak environmental regulation and severe environmental pollution. Further, mechanism tests show that EPIL enhances judicial efficiency, strengthens government oversight, and heightens public engagement, and reshapes corporate environmental strategies, through which corporate greenwashing is reduced. This study contributes to the existing literature on the influence of formal institutions on greenwashing by shedding light on the significant role of environmental judicial reform in restraining corporate greenwashing behavior.

Source: Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05203-1

Authors: Jiacai Xiong, Zelin Yang, Lijuan Xiao, Yushu Zhu

Institutions: Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, The University of Queensland

Language: English

Topic: Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting

Subfield: Strategy and Management

Field: Business, Management and Accounting

Domain: Social Sciences

SDGs: Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Responsible consumption and production

Open Access status: gold

Estimated APC paid: $1,890