Making Sense of Epistemic Authority
Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: This paper explores the debate surrounding epistemic authority, questioning whether experts’ opinions bind us and if there is a duty to believe based on their testimony. Zagzebski’s classical theory, inspired by Joseph Raz’s Pre-emption Thesis, suggests replacing existing evidence with an authority’s testimony, a position that has faced criticism. The aim of the paper is to bring order to the ongoing debate surrounding the normative force of epistemic authority and assess the implications of rejecting the Pre-emption Thesis. In particular, it questions how to think about possible positive epistemic duties towards epistemically superior agents, without breaking standard evidential norms and in view of practical risks of abusive authority.
Source: Social Epistemology
Author: Dominik Jarczewski
Institution: Jagiellonian University
Language: English
Subfield: Philosophy
Field: Arts and Humanities
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
Funder: Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Award: G3863732439
OpenAlex ID: W4415591805
