Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: Much is now being said in the wake of artificial intelligence (AI) about marking and assessments. This year represents the first year in which generative AI usage is considered by the scholarly community to be widespread. The article responds to the recent policy outlined by UCL Laws to introduce a return to traditional assessments, which preserve the integrity of a law degree. We place this debate within the wider context of law schools and what legal education ought to provide for society, more generally. Universities and law schools have different public mandates and should respond in accordance with their aims, community and identity. Keywords: AI; legal education; assessments; law degree; legal profession; law in context.
Source: Amicus Curiae
Authors: Victoria Barnes, Liam Sunner, Monica Vessio
Institutions: Queen's University Belfast, University of Reading
Language: English
Subfield: Law
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W4415817507
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: