Year: 2025
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: 50% h-ATG vs. 46% r-ATG) and at last follow-up (41% vs. 39%) were comparable between two groups.The median ANC at diagnosis was lower in non-responders (70/μl) than that of responders (218/ μl, p<0.01).HSCT was performed in 59% (h-ATG) and 55% (r-ATG) of patients.Clonal evolution occurred in three patients (all r-ATG).Five-year overall survival (OS) favored h-ATG (95% vs. 85%, p=0.07), while failure-free survival was similar between two groups.Responders at 6 months had superior OS (97% vs. 79%, p<0.01).Non-responders with an ANC of <200/μl at day 90 tended to have poorer OS compared to those with an ANC of >200/μl (75% vs. 90%, p = 0.09).Conclusions: Although the response rates and FFS were similar between the two ATG groups, OS was higher in patients receiving h-ATG, indicating a potential advantage of h-ATG.Patients with persistent severe neutropenia may benefit from early HSCT.
Source: EJC Paediatric Oncology
Authors: Francesco Pegoraro, Agnese Roveta, Laura Giunti, Maria Fay Cortella, Elena Mastrodicasa, Giorgio Costagliola, Baldassarre Martire, Francesco Saettini, Maria Carla Giarratana, Antonio Marzollo, Angelica Barone, Giovanna Giagnuolo, Marta Pillon, Carlo Dufour, Marinella Veltroni, Francesca Fioredda
Language: English
Subfield: Genetics
Domain: Life Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $2,340
OpenAlex ID: W4415903256
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to:
