Year: 2025
Type: erratum
Abstract: In the original version of the article, we mistakenly used the beta coefficient for the association between log-PFOA and kidney cancer from Steenland et al. 2022, instead of its OR value. Here, we report the results of the meta-analyses re-ran using the corrected value. In detail, we corrected Figures 2 and 3, as well as Supplemental Figures 2 and 4, that replace the previously published versions. The following Table shows the corrected mRR, 95% CI, I2 and heterogeneity P-value, and publication bias P-value, that replace those reported in the text. Meta-analysis Figure mR R 95% CI I2 (P-value) publication bias P-value Kidney cancer – quantitative 2A 1.05 0.69 – 1.60 77.4% (0.012) 0.49 Kidney cancer – quartiles 2B 1.36 0.35 – 5.23 77.0% (0.013) 0.30 RCC – quantitative Suppl. 2A 1.05 0.68 – 1.60 77.5% (0.012) 0.55 RCC – quartiles Suppl. 2B 1.37 0.35 – 5.35) 76.9% (0.013) 0.55 White individuals Suppl 4 1.19 0.92 – 1.53 20.8% (0.28) 0.66 mRR, meta-relative risk; CI, confidential interval, I2, heterogeneity. Importantly, these corrections do not alter the main results, the interpretation of the findings or the principal conclusions of our study.
Source: Frontiers in Oncology
Language: English
Subfield: Environmental Chemistry
Field: Environmental Science
Domain: Physical Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $3,801
OpenAlex ID: W4415996752
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: