Assessing the influence of morphological variability and classifier arrangement on tandem particle classification analysis
Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: Aerosol science relies on multiple classification techniques that separate particles based on distinct physical properties such as mass, mobility, and aerodynamic diameter. Instruments like the differential mobility analyser (DMA), aerosol aerodynamic classifier (AAC), and centrifugal particle mass analyser (CPMA) enable these separations. By combining two of these measurement methods in tandem, it becomes possible to infer additional particle characteristics, such as effective density, which are crucial for understanding aerosol morphology. In this work, we investigate how morphological diversity within a particle population and classification-induced asymmetries influence the retrieval of average aerosol properties in tandem measurements. Numerical simulations reveal that instruments such as the AAC and, to a lesser extent, the CPMA select particles asymmetrically about the mean of a mass–mobility distribution, leading to systematic shifts in the inferred effective density. Experimental measurements of soot aerosols confirm these predictions, showing that the order of classifiers in tandem setups alters the retrieved mass–mobility parameters, in some cases producing physically unrealistic exponents. These findings highlight that classification-induced biases, if unaccounted for, can lead to misinterpretation of ensemble-averaged morphology, particularly for morphologically diverse aerosols. We emphasise the need for careful selection of classifier pairings and correction strategies when comparing mass–mobility relationships across different instruments, studies, or laboratories.
Source: Journal of Aerosol Science
Institutions: University of Cambridge, Stanford University
Language: English
Subfield: Atmospheric Science
Field: Earth and Planetary Sciences
Domain: Physical Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $2,850
OpenAlex ID: W4416041339