Stakeholder-driven, consensus development methods to design an ethical framework and guidelines for engaged research
Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: Increasingly, researchers seek to engage communities, patients, and stakeholders as partners in the process and products of health research. However, there is no existing stakeholder-driven ethical framework for such engaged scholarship. We employed an iterative, stakeholder-engaged method to develop a data-driven framework for the ethical review and conduct of engaged scholarship. We used consensus development conference methods and a modified Delphi survey to engage 240 community members, ethicists, and academic researchers. This multi-staged process produced a framework with 4 domains: vision of equitable and just research, relationship dynamics, community-informed risk/benefits assessment, and accountability. Within the framework, 4 cross-cutting considerations and 15 statements explicate the stakeholders’ priorities for the ethical review and conduct of engaged scholarship. Though the findings are promising, the study is limited in that it focuses on stakeholder perspectives, but does not actually evaluate or apply the findings in the field. The stakeholder-engaged framework provides a platform for further articulation of ethical practices and policy for engaged scholarship.
DOI: 10.17615/rj8d-9193
Authors: Watson-Hopper S, Rennie S, Richmond A, Wynn M, Hoover S.M, Nisbeth K.S, Corbie-Smith G, Green M
Institution: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Language: English
Topic: Ethics in Clinical Research
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W4416049668
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to:
