Work

Cost-Effective Perspective of Fiber-Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Under Different Curing Regimes

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: Composite geopolymer concrete (CGPC), is receiving growing attention in the construction sector for its sustainable nature, environmental benefits, and its valuable role in promoting efficient waste utilization. The strategic incorporation of reinforcing fibers into geopolymer concrete (GPC) matrices is critical for enhancing mechanical performance and meeting the durability requirements of high-performance construction applications. Although substantial research has focused on strength enhancement of fiber-reinforced geopolymer concrete (FGPC) individually, it has neglected practical considerations such as energy use for curing and life-cycle assessments. Thus, this study investigates the cost-effective aspects of FGPC cured under different regimes. Different cementitious binders were incorporated, i.e., fly ash (FA) and ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), in addition to alkaline activators (a combination of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate), hooked-end steel fibers (HESFs), basalt fibers (BFs), and polypropylene fibers (PPFs), as well as aggregates (gravel and sand). The effect of different geopolymer-based materials, reinforcing fibers, and different curing regimes on the mechanical, durability, and economic performance were analyzed. Results showed that the applied thermal curing regimes (oven curing or steam curing) had a considerable impact on durability performance, compressive strength, and flexural strength development, especially for GPC mixes involving high FA content. Cost analysis outcomes suggested that the most affordable option is GPCM1 (100% FA without fibers), but it demonstrates low strength under ambient curing conditions; RGCM4 (100% GGBS and 0.75% HESF) provided the best strength and durability option but at higher material cost; RGCM7 (50% FA, 50% GGBS, and 0.75% HSF) exhibited a balanced choice since it offer satisfied strength and durability performance with moderate cost compared to other options.

Source: Construction Materials

DOI: 10.3390/constrmater5040081

Authors: Sarah Al-Qutaifi, Rusul M. Rashid, Atared Salah Kawoosh

Institution: Thi Qar University

Language: English

Topic: Concrete and Cement Materials Research

Subfield: Civil and Structural Engineering

Field: Engineering

Domain: Physical Sciences

SDGs: Responsible consumption and production, Industry, innovation and infrastructure

Open Access status: gold

Estimated APC paid: $1,207