Work

Prophylactic laxative use for postoperative constipation in urological cancer: a real-world cohort study

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of prophylactic laxative use compared to symptom-based management for preventing constipation in patients undergoing surgery for urological cancers. METHODS: Of 2,024 screened patients (aged 18-80) with urological tumors, 1,724 eligible (no severe gastrointestinal disease, non-pregnant, scheduled for surgery) were non-randomly assigned to prevention (prophylactic laxatives, n = 965) or non-prevention groups (symptom-based, n = 748). Propensity score matching with a 1:1 optimal matching strategy was used to minimize baseline differences between the two groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of constipation within 7 days post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBM), patient assessment of constipation quality of life (PAC-QOL) scores, and patient assessment of constipation symptoms (PAC-SYM) scores at 7 days post-surgery. A nomogram was developed for predicting postoperative constipation. RESULTS: Compared to non-prevention, the incidence of postoperative constipation was significantly lower in the prevention group (12.3% vs. 42.7%; HR 0.24, 95% CI: 0.19-0.30, P < 0.001). A higher proportion of patients in the prevention group achieved ≥ 3 CSBMs per week ( 96.0% vs. 88.2%, P < 0.001), and PAC-SYM mean difference (MD = - 0.56, 95% CI: -0.79 to - 0.33) and PAC-QOL (MD = - 1.22, 95% CI: -2.03 to - 0.41) scores were improved. Age, constipation diagnosis, prophylactic laxative use, and baseline CSBM were identified as independent risk factors for postoperative constipation. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic laxative use was associated with a significantly lower incidence of postoperative constipation in patients with urological tumors. Our findings offer preliminary evidence for clinicians in identifying patients at risk of developing postoperative constipation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2100042876 ( www.chictr.org.cn ).

Source: World Journal of Urology

DOI: 10.1007/s00345-025-06050-0