Work

Long-term safety outcomes and patient preferences for home-based intravenous enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in Pompe disease and Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I (MPS-I): final results of two-year observation

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Pompe disease and Mucopolysaccharidoses Type I (MPS-I) are lysosomal disorders caused by a deficiency of α-glucosidase and alpha-L-iduronidase, respectively. The mainstay of treatment is enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), a life-long treatment that requires regular I.V. infusions. Hospital-based therapy can, however, negatively impact quality of life over time. The purpose of the HomERT study (Home infusions of ERT) was to evaluate the safety, treatment compliance, and treatment satisfaction related to home therapy of Pompe disease patients with Myozyme® (alglucosidase alfa) and MPS-I patients with Aldurazyme® (laronidase). The final results are presented in this paper. RESULTS: The HomERT study was a multicenter, non-interventional, minimum 12-month prospective observational, double-cohort study that analyzed 56 patients from 14 sites in Italy from October 2021 to February 2024: cohort A (Pompe disease − 47 patients) and cohort B (MPS-I − 9 patients: 6 Hurler/Scheie, 3 Scheie). During the observation period, the mean (SD) number of missed infusions was 5.8 (3.92) in cohort A and 3.0 (3.52) in cohort B, corresponding to a mean (SD) of missed infusions of 19.8 (32.7)% and 4.1 (4.2)%, respectively, versus the number of planned infusions. Only 2 patients in cohort A returned to the hospital setting due to “adverse event” and “other” reasons. A total of 13 Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) were reported during the home-care setting before and after enrollment. The average number of ADRs per patient was 0.2 (1.46) in cohort A and 0.2 (0.67) in group B, and the rate of ADRs/year was 0.15 (95% CI: 0.06; 0.34) in cohort A and 0.06 (95% CI: 0.01; 0.38) in cohort B. The majority of patients preferred home-based infusions (cohort A: 93.6%; cohort B: 88.9%), and the main reason was attributed to treatment convenience (cohort A: 93.6%; cohort B: 100%). Despite the underlying conditions, most patients self-evaluated their health as “Fair” in cohort A (36.2%) and “Good” in cohort B (44.5%). CONCLUSION: The use of ERT with α-glucosidase and alpha-L-iduronidase alfa remains a strong candidate for home therapy, with favorable safety profile, improved treatment ERT compliance, and patient satisfaction. NCT05073783.

Source: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases

DOI: 10.1186/s13023-025-04108-1