Work

Ecological Control Zoning and Improvement Strategy Based on Ecological Security Pattern in Changsha–Zhuzhou–Xiangtan Urban Agglomeration

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: The construction of urban ecological security patterns (ESPs) is an effective approach for managing ecological space and preventing the uncontrolled expansion of urban areas, thereby safeguarding the ecological security of urban agglomerations. This study focuses on the Changsha–Zhuzhou–Xiangtan Urban Agglomeration (CZTUA), utilizing an ESP framework based on ecosystem services, ecological sensitivity, landscape connectivity, and resistance surfaces (SSCR). The spatio-temporal evolution and driving forces of ESP were analyzed for 2010, 2015, and 2020. Based on this, the ecological control zones of the CZTUA were delineated according to ecosystem importance, and appropriate ecological improvement strategies were proposed. The findings revealed the following: (1) The number of ecological sources in the CZTUA decreased from 26 to 23, while their total area expanded from 1113.6 km2 to 3013.96 km2, indicating a “point-to-patch” development trend. Ecological corridors showed a “decrease–increase”trend in number, but their total length consistently contracted from 1025.69 km to 536.25 km, with greater emphasis on the efficiency and effectiveness of connecting habitats. Ecological nodes decreased from 14 to 5, while their aggregate area increased from 290.6 km2 to 1796.48 km2, mirroring changes in ecological sources. (2) Ecological sources, corridors, and nodes in the CZTUA are primarily located in the eastern mountainous and hilly regions, with a trend of expansion toward the western areas. The spatial distribution of corridors and nodes is shaped by these sources, with dense areas exhibiting short-distance networks and dispersal areas showing long-distance linear patterns. Node distribution shifts from entry/exit areas of ecological sources and corridors to the sources themselves. (3) The spatio-temporal evolution of the ESP in the CZTUA is driven by a dual-wheel mechanism of “natural foundation-policy regulation,” where precipitation and potential evapotranspiration serve as the primary natural drivers, manifested through water conservation. (4) The region is divided into three control levels: the core protected areas focus on ecological protection in the eastern mountainous and hilly regions; the ecological buffer areas emphasize ecological coordination in transitional landforms such as hills, medium-undulating mountains, and platforms; the intensive development areas, mostly located in platform, plain, and some hilly areas, prioritize ecological optimization. The three-tier control zones implement strategies of strict protection, buffering and coordination, and optimized development, respectively, providing a direct basis for the refined management of ecological spaces.

Source: Sustainability

DOI: 10.3390/su172310444