Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: What do images ask of the future, and what promises do we owe them? Reading Agnès Varda’s Mur Murs and Visages Villages with Derrida’s archive and de Certeau’s city-writing in mind, I treat Varda’s walls as contested palimpsests. Film overwrites and counter-inscribes surfaces, yet it keeps undertexts legible. I set aside Michael Cramer’s divide between community murals and externally authored photomurals; rather than framing them as opposed projects, the films share one practice: collective inscription, archival method, shifting temporal sense. In Mur Murs, Varda’s camera lets living people eclipse their monumental doubles and turns trompe-l’œil and hushed voices into layers of the palimpsest that refuse closure. In Visages Villages, the larger-than-life portrait of the last remaining inhabitant of a former mining town and the colossal figures of dockworkers’ wives recenter overlooked lives while keeping their impermanence in view. Across both films, cinema becomes the archivable surface: framing, montage, and projection “write” the wall, preserving disappearance even as each screening adds a new layer. Varda practices a careful ethics of remembering that remains future-facing, aware of institutions, and shaped by reality, yet always keeping the walls of stucco, metal, glass, and rock open to re-reading and re-inscription.
Source: Humanities
DOI: 10.3390/h14120227
Author: Natalie Muñoz
Institution: California State University, Fresno
Language: English
Topic: Cinema History and Criticism
Subfield: Visual Arts and Performing Arts
Field: Arts and Humanities
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $1,689
OpenAlex ID: W4416501289