Work

Efficacy of Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, and Nd:YAG lasers for caries removal: A systematic review

Year: 2025
Type: review
Study design: Systematic Review
Abstract: • Laser-assisted caries removal has proven to be an effective and minimally invasive technique, and offers promising results in histological evaluations, with open dentinal tubules and absence of smear layer. • Laser removal caries demonstrates improved patient comfort, particularly in pediatric dentistry, where it may reduce the need for anesthesia and improve cooperation. • Among the ten studies with low or moderate risk of bias included in this systematic review, five showed superior efficacy of laser for caries removal, while others highlighted comparable outcomes or longer working times, emphasizing the need for further high-quality research to support broader clinical use. Laser technology is increasingly used in dentistry due to its minimally invasive properties. Among its applications, caries removal has gained attention. The most frequently used lasers in this context are Er:YAG, Nd:YAG, and Er,Cr:YSGG. To systematically evaluate the efficacy, treatment efficiency, and histological outcomes of different lasers used for caries removal in comparison with conventional methods. A qualitative systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted on December 1, 2024, and updated on December 5, 2024, in the databases Medline, Scopus, SciELO, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library. In vivo and in vitro studies assessing Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, or Nd:YAG lasers for caries removal were included. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I V2 tools. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria (five in vitro and six in vivo ). Most studies reported thar Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers achieved effective caries removal, selective ablation of infected dentin and favorable histologlical features (open dentinal tubules, absence of smear layer). Nd:YAG showed lower ablation efficiency and was mainly effective for surface modification. Laser treatment generally required longer time than rotary excavation but caused less pain and anxiety in clinical studies. Heterogeneity among studies prevented meta-analysis. Erbium lasers, particularly Er:YAG, appear effective and conservative for caries removal, supporting their use within minimally invasive dentistry. However, due to methodological variability, limited evidence for Er,Cr:YSGG and Nd:YAG, and lack of long-term outcomes, further well-designed randomized trials are needed. Laser-assisted caries removal represents a promising alternative to conventional methods, especially for patients with high dental anxiety or requiring minimally invasive procedures.
Language: English
Field: Medicine
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $4,160
OpenAlex ID: W4416549170
FWCI: 1.499
Cites: 32
Cited by: 6
Related to: